Employment law 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Employment law 1 - Essay ExampleIn the above case, Wal-Mart is non liable for any offense since US constitution protects employees with crook downplay from any form of discriminative practices in employment matters. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964 prohibits all forms of employment discrimination on the basis of national origin, religion, color, or race (Repa 15). In the above case, Wal-Mart had no hiring policy requiring the criminal background of the potential employees. In the case, Bobby has only previous being convicted of a misdemeanor and not rape. However, Wal-Mart can go across a policy to request the criminal background of employees, but it must put into consideration the reputation of job, the gravity of past convicted offense and time lapse since the offense before making the hiring decision (Repa 67). Wal-Mart is not liable for not requesting the criminal background of Bobby since no employment law requires the company to do so. equalize employment opportuni ty guidelines require all employees to avoid or minimize requesting the criminal background of employees since this whitethorn lead to discrimination in employment practices (Walsh 163).Under Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines, Wal-Mart is not supposed to deny Bobby the employment opportunity even if the company has a policy on employee criminal background screening except when the crime is job-related (Walsh 162). Wal-Mart is not liable for any offense in hiring Bobby considering no hiring policy that requires the background checks of employees and the nature of past convictions and the current allegations of