Reading response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 6

Reading response - Assignment ExampleSagoff however, argues against this idea (Sagoff 2).Sagoff states that animals and trees can be given the same rights as human beings (3). It further states that it is hard to comfort animals just because they are capable of suffering. In his argument against environmentalism, he gives an example that if man is to be prevented from hunting a deer, then a cat should wishwise not hunt a mouse. This, the author says is one of the reasons why environmentalism principle cannot be fully implemented. He also argues against the claim by this group that groups and organizations like the Wildlife Fund have failed in their duties. Sagoff indicates that the duties of such organizations are based on biological factors and not on total environmentalism.The second group which the author duologue about is the liberators who argue that animals have legal rights. This group advocate for equality. According to the author, the group advocates that it is the moral duty of the human beings to protect the environment and other infuriated animals since they have rights (Sagoff 5). This second group extends the moral boundaries so as to include the animals and all other creatures including trees. The liberators believe that tree and animals have legal al-Qaidaing and because of this, their relate should be represented in the courts, just the same way human interest is represented in court. This, the author says is totally impossible.Sagoff goes ahead to indicate that the benefit of all animals is in the hands of the society (4). Moreover, the society should not only attend to the needs of the domestic animals, but also the animals without help who are miserably out there in the wild. This he said is because the domestic animals are not in any special class. In defending his claim, the author argues that his stand should not be taken to be similar to those of animal liberators